![]() ![]() ![]() Harvey Silverglate, a Cambridge-based civil rights attorney, said the current law appropriately focuses on the “most dangerous” of criminals. Opponents included Kade Crockford, speaking on behalf of the ACLU of Massachusetts, who said the measure could have “far-reaching negative effects and open up a Pandora's box of potential unintended consequences, including political harassment and intimidation.” On Tuesday, the state Joint Committee on the Judiciary held a three-hour virtual public hearing to discuss the proposal. Charlie Baker last month filed a bill to update the statute, saying that law enforcement should be able to use the tool to investigate other crimes, including murder, rape and trafficking. The law currently limits wiretapping to situations linked to “organized crime," which involve an “enterprise to supply illegal goods and services.” Gov. Civil rights attorneys, public defenders, privacy activists and some lawmakers warn that a state proposal to expand a 1968 wiretapping law would be an unnecessary and dangerous overreach of government surveillance. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |